Trump’s AG Pam Bondi is moved to heavily-guarded military base after threats over Epstein files and from cartels: report
Attorney General Pam Bondi has reportedly been moved to secure housing on a Washington, D.C. area military base after she received threats from drug cartels and those angry over her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, according to a new report.
Sometime in the past month, Bondi was moved out of an apartment in Washington, D.C. after federal law enforcement officials flagged the threats against her, The New York Times reports, citing "people familiar with the situation."
Bondi reportedly began receiving threats in the wake of the Trump administration's capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in January, a senior official with direct knowledge told The NYT.
The report did not include specific details of any of the threats made against Bondi.
She isn't the only Trump administration official who has been moved onto military bases to protect them from blowback.
open image in gallery
Attorney General Pam Bondi has been moved to military housing in the Washington, D.C. area after she received threats from drug cartels and those angry over her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and file release, according to a new report (AFP via Getty Images)
President Donald Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller — widely seen as the architect of Trump's heavy-handed anti-immigration agenda — has also been moved into protective housing.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, former Department of Homeland Security Director Kristi Noem, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have also been placed in secured housing.
All of the officials are the public faces of Trump's most controversial undertakings — his foreign policy, his anti-immigration agenda, and his military adventurism — and now Bondi, the face of the Justice Department that handled the Epstein case, will join them. The report did not disclose the exact location of the base where the AG has been moved.
It's unclear if Bondi and the rest of Trump's front-liners are paying to stay on the bases. Last year, before she was ousted, Noem told The NYT that she was paying "fair-market rent" for her on-base housing.
U.S. officials who are at risk of being targeted by domestic or foreign threats taking up residence on military bases is not an unprecedented practice. During Trump's first term, Mike Pompeo similarly stayed on a base, as did Trump's then-Defense Secretary James Mattis.
During former President George W. Bush's administration, his Defense Secretary Robert Gates, stayed in naval housing near Washington, D.C. In 1974, Congress approved the use of the U.S. Naval Observatory for use as the vice president’s residence.
open image in gallery
The US Vice President's Residence at the Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C. (AFP via Getty Images)
Bondi's move to base housing reportedly occurred around or just after the Super Bowl, based on the report. During this year's Super Bowl, the survivors of Epstein's crimes ran a televised public service announcement pleading with Bondi to adhere to the terms of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and release all of the documents the government has regarding the investigation.
“Stand With Us, Tell Attorney General Pam Bondi It’s Time For The Truth,” the PSA said.
Bondi and the Department of Justice released more than 3.5 million documents relating to Epstein in late January, some 42 days after it was legally required to do so. But the public later learned there were documents pertaining to Epstein that, for reasons unknown, the Justice Department did not make public. That revelation gave rise to renewed suspicions of a cover-up by the Trump administration.
Bondi has faced criticism not only for failing to release all of the Epstein files, but also for failing to properly redact the files that were released. She was forced to remove thousands of published Epstein documents because they contained names and other identifying information about victims.
open image in gallery
Victims of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein react as US Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on "Oversight of the Department of Justice" on Capitol Hill on February 11 (AFP/Getty)
“This latest release of Jeffrey Epstein files is being sold as transparency, but what it actually does is expose survivors,” Epstein victims wrote in a statement following the release. “Once again, survivors are having their names and identifying information exposed, while the men who abused us remain hidden and protected. That is outrageous,"
They continued, saying that “as survivors, we should never be the ones named, scrutinized, and re-traumatized while Epstein’s enablers continue to benefit from secrecy."
"This is a betrayal of the very people this process is supposed to serve," the letter said.
The Independent has requested comment from the Department of Justice
BREAKING: Ilhan Omar KICKED OUT of Democrat Party as Money Laundering Probe EXPLODES! - News
BREAKING: Ilhan Omar KICKED OUT of Democrat Party as Money Laundering Probe EXPLODES!
In a shocking turn of events, Representative Ilhan Omar has become a focal point of controversy within the Democratic Party.
Recent reports indicate that party insiders are increasingly frustrated with the Minnesota congresswoman.
They are reportedly calling for her removal from the party, citing her growing toxicity as a liability in the upcoming elections.
But Omar is not the only progressive figure facing scrutiny.
Even Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, once considered a rising star within the party, is drawing concern among Democratic leadership.
As the party grapples with these internal conflicts, the political landscape in Washington is shifting dramatically.
Adding to the drama, Congress is preparing to release years of hidden sexual harassment settlement records.
These payouts could expose shocking misconduct on Capitol Hill and potentially implicate powerful lawmakers, further complicating the party’s challenges.
The Omar Controversy
Ilhan Omar’s journey in Congress has been marked by both fierce support and intense criticism.
Her outspoken views on foreign policy, social justice, and immigration have made her a champion for many progressives.
However, her recent controversies have led to a significant backlash.
Insiders within the Democratic Party are reportedly concerned that her continued presence could alienate moderate voters, particularly in swing districts.
As the party prepares for the 2024 elections, the stakes are high.
The call for her departure reflects a broader struggle within the party to balance progressive ideals with the need for electability.
Ocasio-Cortez Under Fire
Alongside Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is also facing increased scrutiny.
Once seen as an unassailable figure in the Democratic Party, her recent actions and statements have raised eyebrows among party leaders.
Ocasio-Cortez’s willingness to challenge the establishment and advocate for bold reforms has garnered her a loyal following.
Yet, as the party navigates a complex political landscape, her approach is being reevaluated.
The concern is that her progressive stance may not resonate with all voters, particularly those in more conservative districts.
The Democratic leadership is now faced with the challenging task of uniting various factions within the party while maintaining their electoral viability.
The Sexual Harassment Settlement Records
In a parallel development, Congress is preparing to unveil years of concealed sexual harassment settlement records.
These records, which detail payouts made to victims, could reveal disturbing patterns of misconduct among lawmakers.
The potential fallout from these revelations could be significant, impacting not just individual politicians but the reputation of the entire Congress.
As the public becomes increasingly aware of these issues, calls for accountability are growing louder.
This situation adds another layer of complexity to the Democratic Party’s current struggles.
With Omar and Ocasio-Cortez under fire, the party must also contend with the implications of these forthcoming disclosures.
The Firing of Kristi Noem
In a surprising twist, reports have emerged regarding the sudden firing of Kristi Noem from the Department of Homeland Security.
The circumstances surrounding her dismissal remain unclear, but insiders suggest that it may be linked to internal conflicts and political maneuvering.
Noem’s departure raises questions about stability within the department and the broader implications for immigration policy.
As the Biden administration faces mounting challenges, the loss of a key figure like Noem could have far-reaching effects.
The View’s Cancellation Rumors
Meanwhile, over at The View, producers appear to be scrambling as rumors of cancellation swirl.
In an unexpected move, the show recently invited a conservative guest, leading to an explosive clash on air.
This decision seems aimed at appeasing critics and regulators who have voiced concerns about the show’s direction.
However, it remains to be seen whether this strategy will quell the mounting criticism or further alienate viewers.
The dynamic at The View reflects the broader challenges facing media outlets in a polarized political climate.
Conclusion
As the Democratic Party navigates these turbulent waters, the future of key figures like Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hangs in the balance.
The party’s ability to address internal conflicts, respond to emerging scandals, and maintain a united front will be critical in the lead-up to the 2024 elections.
With the stakes higher than ever, the coming months will undoubtedly be pivotal for the Democratic Party.
