GOP CongressMan Pete Stauber EXPLODES On Democrat Gov. Tim Walz! Exposes His LIES & STOLEN Valour
‘Stolen Valor’ Showdown: Congressman Stauber Dismantles Governor Walz’s Credibility in Explosive Hearing
Accusations of Lying About Military Service and Comparing ICE to the Gestapo Lead to Political Meltdown
00:17 00:00 00:30 Powered by GliaStudiosWASHINGTON, D.C. — A routine congressional oversight hearing descended into a fierce, raw personal confrontation when Republican Congressman Pete Stauber (R-MN) methodically attacked the credibility of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, culminating in a dramatic accusation of “stolen valor” and exposing inconsistencies in the Governor’s military record.
Stauber, a 23-year veteran of law enforcement, used his time not to debate policy abstracts, but to force Walz to defend his most controversial public statements and his history, resulting in a chaotic, unscripted political meltdown.
The Gestapo Label and the Terrorist Arrests
The confrontation began with Stauber pressing Walz on his infamous public comparison of immigration enforcement officers to the “modern-day Gestapo.” Walz attempted to deflect, arguing his comments were about the importance of “due process” to law students.
Stauber immediately deployed an ethical trap, forcing Walz to confront the real-world consequences of his rhetoric:
Terrorist Arrest: Walz confirmed that a violent Al-Shabaab terrorist who entered the country illegally was arrested in Minneapolis last year.
Child Predators: Walz affirmed that three illegal child predators were arrested by ICE in St. Paul earlier this year.
Stauber then delivered the knockout blow: “Are the officers who arrested the Al-Shabaab terrorists or the child predators? Are they Nazis or the Gestapo?”
Walz attempted to retreat, claiming the comment referred only to “the tactics of wearing masks,” but the damage was done. Stauber established that the Governor’s incendiary rhetoric was aimed at the very officers who protect his constituents from serious threats, including terrorism and sexual violence. Stauber noted the stark consequence: the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association did not support Walz in the last election, linking the Governor’s political rhetoric directly to a loss of essential law enforcement support.
.
.
.
The Military Service Implosion: ‘Stolen Valor’
The questioning escalated into a full-scale personal indictment when Stauber challenged Walz’s military record—a cornerstone of the Governor’s public identity as a retired Command Sergeant Major in the Army National Guard.
Stauber demanded: “Governor, what weapons did you carry in war?”
Walz hesitated and deflected, leading Stauber to unleash the most damaging accusation: “You lied to the Minnesotans. You said that you carried weapons in war. That is stolen valor.”
The accusation, which involves falsely representing military service—a deeply sensitive violation of public trust—ignited chaos. Objections erupted across the room as Walz struggled to defend himself, shouting over the Congressman: “My 24 years was public many years for lying. Apologize for lying.”
Stauber refused to yield, doubling down on the discrepancy:
The Rank Dispute: Stauber held up Walz’s challenge coin, which reportedly claimed Walz retired as a Command Sergeant Major (E-9), a prestigious rank. Walz was forced to confirm under oath that he actually retired as a Master Sergeant (E-8) and clarified that the coin only said he “wore the rank.” Stauber seized on the inconsistency: “You didn’t retire, did you?” and then held up a picture of the coin, stating, “I’m disgusted with you.”
The moment exposed what Stauber alleged was a deliberate pattern of exaggeration designed to enhance political standing. The accusation of “stolen valor,” compounded by the confirmed rank disparity, severely damaged Walz’s credibility on live television.
The Abject Failure and the End of the Exchange
Stauber further weakened Walz’s position by recalling the Governor’s own words concerning the 2020 Minneapolis riots, which Walz himself had previously described as an “abject failure.” Stauber used this quote to hammer home the point that Walz had failed to protect his state from lawlessness, comparing the situation to recent unrest in other major American cities.
When the exchange finally ended, Walz’s attempts to deflect were exhausted. He tried to claim he should be allowed to speak beyond his time, but Stauber’s final jab—made on behalf of the people “from the land of rocks and cows”—underscored that the Congressman, the veteran and former police officer, had completely dominated the confrontation.
The hearing was a clear demonstration of the destructive power of personal scrutiny in politics. Stauber’s refusal to accept deflections, his reliance on official records, and his final, explosive accusations successfully undermined the Governor’s credibility on issues ranging from public safety to military service, leaving Walz visibly shaken and politically wounded.
Johnson Pushes Back on ‘War Powers’ Vote Amid Iran Strikes
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said on Monday that passing a war powers resolution would strip President Trump of his authority to continue military operations in Iran, warning that such a move would present a “frightening prospect.”
Representatives Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) plan to push for a vote on a war powers resolution this week, which would require Congressional authorization before Trump can use military force against Iran again. They argue that the operations in Iran put U.S. troops at risk and are not representative of an “America First” agenda.
According to a source who spoke to The Hill, the resolution is expected to be brought to the floor on Thursday.
“I think the idea that we would move a War Powers Act vote right now, I mean, it will be forced to the floor, but the idea that we would take the ability of our commander in chief, the president, take his authority away right now to finish this job, is a frightening prospect to me,” Johnson told reporters after a briefing on the operation.
“It’s dangerous, and I am certainly hopeful, and I believe we do have the votes to put it down. That’s going to be a good thing for the country and our security and stability,” he added.
The U.S. and Israel conducted joint military strikes against Iran on Saturday after weeks of threats from Trump, who had called for regime change in Tehran. Johnson wrote on the social platform X that Congress’s bipartisan “Gang of Eight” was “briefed in detail earlier this week that military action may become necessary to protect American troops and American citizens in Iran.”
On Monday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the Iranian military and regime were racing to achieve “immunity” for its ongoing nuclear weapons program, meaning the ability to develop enough ballistic missiles to shield itself and the program from destruction. That’s why Trump chose to act now, he added.
Trump told CNN on Monday morning that the “big wave” of the operation is yet to come. When he was asked how long the war will last, the president said, “I don’t want to see it go on too long. I always thought it would be four weeks. And we’re a little ahead of schedule.”
On Monday, Johnson told reporters he believes Trump “was acting well within his authority” as commander-in-chief to protect the country.
“It’s not a declaration of war. It’s not something that the president was required, because it’s defensive in nature and in design and in necessity, to come to Congress and get a vote first. And if they had briefed a larger group than the Gang of Eight, you know, there’s a real threat that that very sensitive intelligence that we had, you know, might have been leaked or something,” he said.
“So, this is why the commander in chief of our armed forces has the latitude that any commander in chief, any president always has, because they have a set of information that is sensitive, timely and urgent, and they have to be able to act upon it. They did that.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has urged lawmakers to support the war powers resolution, stating in a CNN interview on Monday that Trump needs to be constrained.
Presidents from both parties have taken action on behalf of the country in the past. Also, every president since the act was passed in the early 1970s has said they believe it unconstitutionally limits a president’s Article II authorities.
Trump Escalates Criticism of Ilhan Omar While Aboard Air Force One
What began earlier this month as a viral White House jab at Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has now turned into a broader campaign offensive, with President Donald Trump doubling down on his criticism of the Somali-born congresswoman and the Somali refugee community in the United States.
Omar said during an October appearance on The Dean Obeidallah Show that she was not worried about losing her U.S. citizenship or being sent back to Somalia, where she was born.
“I have no worry, I don’t know how they’d take away my citizenship and like deport me,” Omar said. “But I don’t even know why that’s such a scary threat. I’m not the 8-year-old who escaped war
anymore. I’m grown, my kids are grown. I could go live wherever I want.”
On Nov. 10, the White House posted on X a 2024 photo of Trump waving from a McDonald’s drive-thru window, replying to a clip in which Omar said she was unconcerned about being deported.
The photo — taken during a campaign stop in Pennsylvania — quickly circulated online and was widely interpreted as a taunting “good-bye” message aimed at the Minnesota lawmaker.
Now, the feud has reignited. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump referenced the allegation that Omar had entered the U.S. through a fraudulent marriage.
“She supposedly came into our country by marrying her brother,” he said. “If that’s true, she shouldn’t be a congresswoman, and we should throw her the hell out of the country.”
The president also broadened his remarks to criticize Somali immigration overall.
“Somalis have caused us a lot of trouble, and they cost us a lot of money,” Trump said. “What the hell are we paying Somalia for? We have Ilhan Omar who does nothing but complain about our Constitution and our country! We’re not taking their people anymore — in fact, we’re sending them back.”
Trump has often accused Omar of being “anti-American,” previously telling her and other progressive “Squad” members to “go back” to their “broken and crime-infested countries.” Omar responded earlier this month by calling Trump a “lying buffoon” and saying his story about Somalia’s president refusing to take her back was fabricated.
The White House has signaled that it will not walk back the president’s latest statements. A senior aide said Trump was “reminding voters that America’s generosity should never be repaid with contempt.”
Omar’s family fled Somalia’s civil war in 1991 and spent several years in a Kenyan refugee camp before settling in the United States. She was elected to Congress in 2018, becoming one of the first Muslim women and the first Somali-American to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives.
The renewed confrontation underscores the political tension between Trump and radical members of the “Squad.” It comes amidst growing concerns about immigration policy and the vetting of immigrants in the aftermath of an Afghan refugee’s shooting of two National Guard members over the Thanksgiving holiday.
